> Again, I’m not going to get in the weeds with someone who isn’t arguing in good faith.

The only reason you think you can anticipate my response is because I've correctly anticipated that you don't have an argument. If something comes up that is outside my predictions neither of us knows what I'd do. But I'm predicting a bluff and it has been a long thread of posts now.

> One example would be Manafort and Gates sharing internal polling data with the Russians.

The Russians could hire a polling company at any time. American's don't keep their opinions quiet. How do you want to spin that in to something interesting? Since Manafort's team won the election, it was probably a "hey, we're serious candidates, you should be ready to negotiate with us if we win" thing. Since one of the president's official duties is negotiating with Russians to try and prevent escalations.

Care to reference a page number for this one so I can make sure I'm dealing with the same topic?