Re:Original source of `(seed * 9301 and 49297) % 233280` ran...
by bee_rider on Saturday August 06, 2022 @11:13AM
(#32368809)
It is interesting -- 5/9 of the books listed there are clearly numerics textbooks, so it isn't surprising they talked about a non-cryptographic PRNG. Curious about the other 4. But maybe this shows up as a "here's why you should be careful what type of RNG you are using" type example.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.