Re:What ever happened to the transhumanists?
by causality0 on Friday August 05, 2022 @11:43PM
(#32364626)
I don't think it's a one-dimensional line with pro/anti modification. For example, if you were against people integrating weapons into their bodies or upward-facing eyes into their feet for looking up skirts, that wouldn't make you anti-transhuman.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:What ever happened to the transhumanists?
by axblount on Saturday August 06, 2022 @12:03AM
(#32364719)
Right. But being able to live as your authentic self is a good thing, unlike your examples. Opposing good modifications is anti-transhumanist.
Re:What ever happened to the transhumanists?
by mkmk3 on Saturday August 06, 2022 @02:37AM
(#32365531)
Idk, first the focus on body modifications in the context of what a transhumanist is is a bummer, I always thought imoroved thinking made more sense as the initial goal. And second, how do you determine what is someones authentic self, if theyre pursuing that or if theyre taking advantage of body mods to be pervy or manipulative or do xyz bad thing. Its entirely subjective. Not to say there arent solutions to separate safe mods from unsafe, just that the authentic self feels like too fuzzy a thing to use sincerely, at least I see it as some bundling of your personal values that could be cancerous as far as I know :)
Re:What ever happened to the transhumanists?
by ben_w on Saturday August 06, 2022 @03:16AM
(#32365770)
I'm a furry. Does "being a (cuddly) werewolf" count as a weapon?
Re:What ever happened to the transhumanists?
by mkmk3 on Saturday August 06, 2022 @07:51AM
(#32367270)
Fun example. Or does getting a giant ass, big fake breasts, filled lips, etc. get counted in the same lot? It's definitely funky, in terms of the ethics surrounding it. You could see it as buying into negative (in the sense that they're not equal) biological biases and taking advantage of them. Such a fun lens to consider funky cultural stuff.