Re:Apple warns suppliers to follow China rules on 'Taiwan' l...
by throwaway894345 on Friday August 05, 2022 @07:55PM
(#32363348)
Those weren’t public policies, they were marketing campaigns to divert away from reasonable public policy solutions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple warns suppliers to follow China rules on 'Taiwan' l...
by leereeves on Saturday August 06, 2022 @04:09PM
(#32371146)
They were also public policy goals that were not solved by public policy solutions.
Re:Apple warns suppliers to follow China rules on 'Taiwan' l...
by throwaway894345 on Saturday August 06, 2022 @10:53PM
(#32373469)
No one here claimed that every problem has been solved by public policy.
Re:Apple warns suppliers to follow China rules on 'Taiwan' l...
by leereeves on Sunday August 07, 2022 @03:06AM
(#32374513)
You suggested that personal choice was just a distraction from policy-making, but one of your own examples, cigarettes, shows otherwise.
Personal choice works.
Re:Apple warns suppliers to follow China rules on 'Taiwan' l...
by throwaway894345 on Monday August 08, 2022 @01:44AM
(#32382669)
There was a national campaign against tobacco. Moreover, no one is accidentally buying cigarettes like they’re buying carbon. It’s not like cigarettes were added to every product in unknown quantities and the public managed to avoid purchasing them. Similarly, people can’t simply opt out of carbon—it’s not like people were previously waltzing up to the counter and asking for some carbon, and now they’re not doing it any more. If that’s your “personal responsibility” example, it’s pretty desperate.