News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Launch HN: Taro (YC S22): Private career growth community... by ceeplusplus on Friday August 05, 2022 @05:36PM (#32362252)
Jobs where the difference in output between the best and worst is 10x. Generally creative professions like movie director, writer/journalist, lawyer, etc. SWE tends to fall into this category because the difficulty of writing good code is in some respects like writing good prose: the space of "solutions" is vast and there are few well defined rules by which a "good" solution can be constructed. Not only that, but writing it quickly while maintaining quality is difficult as well.

See for example this blog by Joel Spolsky [1].

[1] https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2005/07/25/hitting-the-high-n...

Re:Launch HN: Taro (YC S22): Private career growth community... by f6v on Saturday August 06, 2022 @03:00AM (#32365673)
Something software engineers came up with to feel exceptional. There’re great people in most professions, but this “10x” concept is completely subjective and not quantifiable.
Re:Launch HN: Taro (YC S22): Private career growth community... by ceeplusplus on Saturday August 06, 2022 @03:38AM (#32365886)
The link provides empirical data backing up the idea of 10x, specifically in the context of the speed and quality with which students come up with solutions to a programming project. Quality is measured by correctness and speed by time spent.

It also provides data showing that speed and correctness are essentially uncorrelated between different people - i.e. just because two different people finish at different speeds, does not mean the faster person has a less correct solution, at least in this specific setting. If you assume that's true generally, that makes the idea that there is a large gap between F500 programmers and FAANG ones even more credible, since the best programmers both produce better solutions and produce them faster.