News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gitlab U-turns on deleting dormant projects after backlash by pca006132 on Friday August 05, 2022 @06:32AM (#32354127)
Regarding copilot training issue, I wonder if they can just train on any open-source projects that they can access, e.g. projects in SourceHut.

I remember their argument is that their training is considered fair use, legal/moral questions aside, doesn't it means that they can also justify using projects hosted on alternative platforms for training?

Re:Gitlab U-turns on deleting dormant projects after backlash by saurik on Friday August 05, 2022 @07:27AM (#32354582)
If your code is open source and matters at all, people put it on GitHub anyway. I refused to self-host any of my stuff on GitHub, but there are a ton of forks and mirrors of old versions there anyway (and then people get confused being unable to find the real copy because there seriously are asshats out there searching for code repositories exclusively on GitHub instead of Google).
Re:Gitlab U-turns on deleting dormant projects after backlash by Volundr on Friday August 05, 2022 @09:03AM (#32355489)
While I am all for hosting elsewhere (and do so myself) I will admit to being one of these asshats. Lots of projects have semi-common names and Google/DDG will often surface irrelevant results. I often find it easier to find projects by just searching GitHub instead.
Re:Gitlab U-turns on deleting dormant projects after backlash by 2Gkashmiri on Friday August 05, 2022 @08:13AM (#32354978)
i am training my brain on the back of the hapless and poor authors like lee child and j.k rowling that i got off of piratebay. why do those "pesky rights" holders release their dogs after me?