Re:The high-stakes race to engineer new psychedelic drugs
by sianemo on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @04:30PM
(#32323888)
Setting aside the hilarious disrespect of assuming that I'm a drug addict from single comment on the internet, you are capable of realizing that taking issue with people who use a drug only because of the mental and social association you have of people who use the drug is a super tight loop of circular logic, aren't you?
Re:The high-stakes race to engineer new psychedelic drugs
by rjbwork on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @05:13PM
(#32324360)
The idea of accusing someone of being a drug addict in the context of psychedelic use is absolutely hilarious. You sound completely uninformed and pretty much nobody should take you seriously on this topic.
Re:The high-stakes race to engineer new psychedelic drugs
by LocalH on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @03:36PM
(#32323274)
Psychedelics are largely not "addictive". Certainly not physiologically, and almost certainly not mentally.
Re:The high-stakes race to engineer new psychedelic drugs
by zone411 on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @04:37PM
(#32323988)
They actually show promise for stopping additions.
Re:The high-stakes race to engineer new psychedelic drugs
by denton-scratch on Wednesday August 03, 2022 @04:51AM
(#32329242)
Many psychedelics are the opposite of addictive: if you take LSD for more than a couple of days, for example, the effect diminishes to nothing, whatever dose you take. You need at least a couple of weeks to re-sensistise.
Re:The high-stakes race to engineer new psychedelic drugs
by ericmcer on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @08:18PM
(#32326096)
I challenge you to find someone addicted to psilocybin. I would be impressed if someone managed to do a trip sized dose let’s say… 2x a week for any long duration.
Re:The high-stakes race to engineer new psychedelic drugs
by scythe on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @03:55PM
(#32323500)
High frequency of use is a necessary condition for addiction.
Re:The high-stakes race to engineer new psychedelic drugs
by toss1 on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @06:47PM
(#32325260)
>>necessary condition for addiction.
Necessary, but not sufficient
You might also note that the GP said nothing about frequency of use, only "long time psych user", AND that no one here has defined "high frequency" in terms of an actual threshold for addiction.
The fact is that for all drugs, and especially for the psychedelics, there are far many more people who use occasionally and responsibly than the subset who are addicted. AFAIK, the psychedelics are not considered addictive at all, either physically/physiologically or mentally.
Re:The high-stakes race to engineer new psychedelic drugs
by galaxyLogic on Wednesday August 03, 2022 @01:22AM
(#32327932)
I agree. Traveling expands the mind, but you don't want to be traveling all the time. Is travel addictive? Maybe for some but for most of us probably not
Re:The high-stakes race to engineer new psychedelic drugs
by InCityDreams on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @11:02PM
(#32327158)
High necessity of use is a frequent condition for addiction.
Addicts insisting that their addiction isn't one is cliché for a reason.