News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ubuntu Security Notice USN-5544-1 Atheros ath9k wireless ... by trasz on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @01:19PM (#32321593)
So, why don’t we have a separate kernel (a VM really) handling WiFi hardware and perhaps some other network stuff? For a laptop the overhead shouldn’t matter match.
Re:Ubuntu Security Notice USN-5544-1 Atheros ath9k wireless ... by aidenn0 on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @01:28PM (#32321712)
Because that would take work; while you're at it why not switch to a decent microkernel and run all of these buggy-as-hell drivers in their own services. I have devices which I have 99% of the time on the kernel blacklist but enable when I need them as the system won't stay up reliably for more than a day or two with them enabled.
Re:Ubuntu Security Notice USN-5544-1 Atheros ath9k wireless ... by craftkiller on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @05:10PM (#32324340)
Thats what wifibox does on FreeBSD (though I believe the reason is more for drivers than for isolation): https://github.com/pgj/freebsd-wifibox
Re:Ubuntu Security Notice USN-5544-1 Atheros ath9k wireless ... by dtx1 on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @01:32PM (#32321781)
Literally what qubes os does