Re:Understanding Jane Street
by serioussecurity on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @03:39AM
(#32316084)
Hawkins is a notorious con artist with nothing to show for almost two decades of work.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I can't judge that from an outside perspective, but to be fair, having nothing to show for two decades of work is an intrinsic occupational risk of science.
Re:Understanding Jane Street
by adamsmith143 on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @12:33PM
(#32320887)
> I can't judge that from an outside perspective, but to be fair, having nothing to show for two decades of work is an intrinsic occupational risk of science.
How? In today's academic environment you won't survive even a few years without publishable research results.