News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Silly Camera Numbers by dekhn on Monday August 01, 2022 @06:00PM (#32312607)
After one attempt at photography in high school, with a SLR and a darkroom, I decided to wait until I felt that the tech had matured enough so that I never, ever had to deal with physical film media. Reciprocity is a perfect example; when I'm in art mode (or scientific data collection), I never want to think about the nonlinearity of my sensor.
Re:Silly Camera Numbers by skhr0680 on Monday August 01, 2022 @09:01PM (#32314063)
Digital sensors get noise instead of reciprocity failure. That’s why the original Acros was so loved for long exposures
Re:Silly Camera Numbers by Doxin on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @05:46AM (#32316783)
Film has noise too. It's called "grain". It even mirrors how DSLRs work pretty directly: Higher ISO values result in more noise/grain.
Re:Silly Camera Numbers by gannonburgett on Thursday August 04, 2022 @02:16PM (#32346394)
Not quite. Film doesn't get more grain with longer exposures, whereas it does with digital sensors, as you can get [hot pixels](https://photofocus.com/software/what-are-hot-pixels-and-how-...) and other artifacts the longer the sensor is exposing a shot.