Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by jcranmer on Monday August 01, 2022 @04:21PM
(#32311547)
One advantage of camo uniforms for working utility uniforms is they tend to be effective in hiding things like grime and mud, which consequently means you need to launder them less frequently to keep up the same appearance. If you've got a solid single-color uniform, chances are that these will stick out like a sore thumb. That was one thing that sailors liked about the old US Navy NWU (the one that camouflaged you very effectively if you fell in the water)--really good at hiding paint drips.
With regards to looking good, I don't think it's necessarily that the look good with appropriate materials, but more that they look good only when they are properly starched and the like to maintain crisp lines.
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by jessaustin on Monday August 01, 2022 @05:59PM
(#32312585)
...camouflaged you very effectively if you fell in the water...
This seems good in some situations and very bad in others?
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by NovemberWhiskey on Monday August 01, 2022 @06:38PM
(#32313030)
>camo uniforms ... which, often as not, are the butts of jokes and not considered at all appealing
I think you'll find they're pretty appealing to a lot of the people who want to be in the military.
Re:U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained (2013)
by imwillofficial on Monday August 01, 2022 @04:08PM
(#32311424)
As a sailor, I always really liked the Coast Guards working uniform.
Simple, effective, dare I say elegant.
Then again, maybe those old styles only looked good when they were made with nice materials, like wool and heavy waxed canvas, and would look bad with cheap modern synthetics.