News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Linux 5.19 by dcminter on Monday August 01, 2022 @06:43AM (#32304175)
The unofficial motto of the Linux kernel is "Don't break userspace" so semver wouldn't be useful.
Re:Linux 5.19 by mort96 on Monday August 01, 2022 @07:21AM (#32304450)
And what's more, the second unofficial motto of the Linux kernel is "break kernel space"; they don't make any attempt at keeping in-kernel APIs stable. So if they followed semver for userspace, they'd be on 1.9000.0, if they followed semver for kernel space they'd be on 9000.0.0.
Re:Linux 5.19 by OJFord on Monday August 01, 2022 @11:52AM (#32307843)
There's value, albeit less in the minor vs patch distinction I think. So you could imagine a world in which SemVer came first, Linux uses it, and we're on 1.5.19 but usually drop the 1. because we've agreed there'll never be a v2.
Re:Linux 5.19 by bonzini on Monday August 01, 2022 @01:14PM (#32309167)
That's pretty much the state of the 3.x releases, but at some point numbers got big.
Re:Linux 5.19 by umanwizard on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @08:07AM (#32317541)
I’d say it was the stage of the 2.6.x series.
Re:Linux 5.19 by bonzini on Wednesday August 03, 2022 @02:28AM (#32328306)
In 2.6.x patch levels were the fourth number in the version, not the third.
Re:Linux 5.19 by umanwizard on Tuesday August 02, 2022 @08:07AM (#32317543)
What would be the point of that?