> Is there a good source for finding strict POSIX tools rather than just go digging?
Some communities(iglunix, kisslinux, carbs linux, wyvertux, oasis linux, ...) are actively researching alternatives to the "standard" coreutils. You could check what they use, perhaps you'll find something interesting and strict. But general source is digging of course :)
> But I guess this can be expected when you are dealing with a tool that has evolved in multiple directions since 1977?
Exactly. 100% conformance isn't always possible, especially when standard is unclear on some things.
I didn't know about these projects; GNU-less Linux is something I've wanted for a long time. Thanks. Are there any other projects you know of (as indicated by your ellipsis)?
Re:Public domain POSIX make
by kevin_thibedeau on Monday August 01, 2022 @06:10AM
(#32303946)
Solaris had all the POSIX userland tools separated from the Sun mainline versions in the /usr/xpg4 and xpg6 directories. They can be a source for replacements.
Re:Public domain POSIX make
by yjftsjthsd-h on Monday August 01, 2022 @12:08PM
(#32308128)
Do those work on anything that isn't Solaris/Illumos?
Sad sidenote on m4, that even with strict POSIX [1], you still have no clue if `define` will turn into “” or “define” due to a split between AT&T on one hand and GNU and BSD (all of them?) on the other that POSIX did not rule one way or the other. It gets even worse when you realise that some m4 implementations have “constants” like `windows` so that “Stained glass windows” can turn into “Stained glass 0”. But I guess this can be expected when you are dealing with a tool that has evolved in multiple directions since 1977?
[1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/m...