News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Time for Army Corps of Engineers to investigate moving wa... by colordrops on Sunday July 31, 2022 @11:44PM (#32301785)
Certain luxury foods or at least less necessary foods take a large percentage of water that could be reallocated to more critical needs. Meat also takes 10x the water needed for many crops. There are many ways to reduce water usage.
Re:Time for Army Corps of Engineers to investigate moving wa... by kickout on Sunday July 31, 2022 @11:55PM (#32301873)
This is true. But, some places like native grasslands have no other viable economic use other than raising cattle/beef. These grasslands are fed by rainfall so the displacement cost is zero.

Different story when there are competeing interests for the land and inefficient uses (I.e growing alfalfa in a desert) are adapted and cemented into law. It’s complicated no doubt.

Re:Time for Army Corps of Engineers to investigate moving wa... by colordrops on Monday August 01, 2022 @01:02AM (#32302252)
Sure, though I believe the vast majority of cattle are not raised on rainfall-fed grassland.

Yes, very complicated. The issue is definitely going to come to a head when the authorities have no option but to start pulling water rights.

Re:Time for Army Corps of Engineers to investigate moving wa... by kickout on Monday August 01, 2022 @09:31AM (#32305692)
You are correct most beef is grain fed or at least grain finished. I believe that can be changed easily enough though. It’s an economic choice they make to grain finish, not necessarily an ecological one.