Re:Riding transit takes almost twice as long as driving (2017)
by Skunkleton on Sunday July 31, 2022 @12:11PM
(#32296525)
I’m not sure where this idea that subways are fast comes from. The average speed of the NY subway system for example is ~20mph. High speed rail is a different story of course.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Riding transit takes almost twice as long as driving (2017)
by tuukkah on Sunday July 31, 2022 @12:21PM
(#32296588)
NY subway is not the best example as it's the oldest and slowest: https://ggwash.org/view/4524/average-schedule-speed-how-does...
Re:Riding transit takes almost twice as long as driving (2017)
by Skunkleton on Sunday July 31, 2022 @02:32PM
(#32297579)
NY had one of the most extensive systems. Compared to other places, like my home in the Bay Area, even at 20mph the subway is effectively faster.
Re:Riding transit takes almost twice as long as driving (2017)
by tuukkah on Sunday July 31, 2022 @03:09PM
(#32297889)
Indeed, the average speed of the subway isn't very meaningful for comparison as the bigger win is being able to skip the traffic jams where the car speed depends highly on the exact route and time of day.
Re:Riding transit takes almost twice as long as driving (2017)
by UIUC_06 on Sunday July 31, 2022 @12:22PM
(#32296597)
> High speed rail is a different story of course.
You must be talking about Japan or Europe.
The California "bullet train" was / is going to take 4 hours to go SF - LA. Less than driving, but about the same as flying, even when you factor in getting to & from the airports and waiting in the departure lounge.
And of course, the train stations are not "everywhere" either. You have to factor in getting to & from them, too. Especially in LA where you hardly ever want to go downtown.
Re:Riding transit takes almost twice as long as driving (2017)
by kareemsabri on Sunday July 31, 2022 @04:15PM
(#32298390)
NY subway for virtually any destination is faster than driving, during busy hours.