Same goes for academia I suppose. When incentives for academia are aligned towards publishing, and if there is minimal or no enforcement of cheating at an organizational level, you’re at a disadvantage if you don’t cheat.
I don’t think Chinese academic institutions have robust academic integrity and enforcement policies and unless that changes, you’re likely to see Chinese academics stuck in a Nash Equilibrium.
When we got his part of the paper it had just been copied wholesale from academic sources; the professor had already been prewarned. We all got an "F", and the one student was put on probation, and lost his funding. It really sucked. The rest of us were given a chance to rewrite the term paper.
> We all got an "F"
> The rest of us were given a chance to rewrite the term paper.
That seems really unfair. Why didn't the rest of you just get a grade based on the quality of the rest of the paper?
e.g. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1178415
which describes cultural differences in cheaters
I’ve observed something sociologically fascinating about China. In multiple fields, gaming, research, academics etc, the proportion of the population likely to cheat seems to be higher in China. Examples include,
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/03/how-so...
https://www.ign.com/articles/2018/02/16/99-of-pubgs-banned-c...
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/college-...
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02587-3
There are cheating scandals everywhere, but, as an outsider, it seems to be somewhat more endemic in China. The anomaly begs the question, why.
Being born in China doesn’t radically wire your brain in a different way. People seem to cheat everywhere, but more people are more likely to cheat here, in this specific environment, why is that? What’s causing them to adopt this behavior as an acceptable strategy?
I can’t seem to find any interesting research on the topic beyond idle speculation. Does anyone know of anyone investigating this?
Note - this comment is not meant to be denigrating nor a judgement, but an observation and a question. The question begs a deeper attempt to ascertain a) if it’s true and b) the factors driving it.