News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NIST announces preliminary winners of post-quantum compet... by westurner on Friday July 29, 2022 @04:20PM (#32281357)
From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31995535 :

> (IDK what the TLS (and FIPS) PQ Algo versioning plans are: 1.4, 2.0?)

Kyber, NTRU, {FIPS-140-3}?

Re:NIST announces preliminary winners of post-quantum compet... by cipherboy on Friday July 29, 2022 @06:48PM (#32282587)
Sorry, reading NIST is worse than reading tea leaves and I don't actively participate in the IETF TLS mailing lists enough to say any more than the next person :-) Just stating that the process (NIST to enterprise customer) takes time for complete PQC adoption across the entire stack.
Re:NIST announces preliminary winners of post-quantum compet... by westurner on Saturday July 30, 2022 @07:43PM (#32291511)
It shouldn't take long to change software: how long does it take to add a dependency on an open implementation and add an optional config file const pending a standardized list of algos like TLS 1.3+ and FIPS, and fallback to non-PQ; like DNSSEC (edit: and WPA2+WPA3)? Do mining rig companies that specialize in ASICs and FPGAs yet offer competitively-priced TLS load balancers -- now with PQ -- or are they still more expensive than mainboards?