Re:Why the Windows Registry sucks technically (2010)
by pie_flavor on Friday July 29, 2022 @02:38PM
(#32280356)
The article's complaints about the format being undocumented are ill-founded, because Microsoft repeatedly tells developers not to read the registry directly, and call the exquisitely documented functions instead. The applications that didn't listen to Microsoft and depended on particular features are most of why it hasn't updated to modern standards in the first place.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why the Windows Registry sucks technically (2010)
by rwmj on Friday July 29, 2022 @04:59PM
(#32281705)
How's that supposed to work if you're modifying it in an offline image from a Linux host?
Re:Why the Windows Registry sucks technically (2010)
by pie_flavor on Saturday July 30, 2022 @05:58PM
(#32290763)
With DISM.
Re:Why the Windows Registry sucks technically (2010)
by rwmj on Sunday July 31, 2022 @10:31AM
(#32295735)
DISM is a proprietary Windows tool, so no use at all for modifying an offline image from a Linux host.
Re:Why the Windows Registry sucks technically (2010)
by pie_flavor on Monday August 01, 2022 @12:32PM
(#32308561)
I'm sure it runs under Wine. But knowing that that's how you service the image means you have no reason to be using a Linux host to do it.