News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Rust is actually portable. Parent comment

Re:Rust is actually portable by tinco on Thursday July 28, 2022 @03:44AM (#32261507)
Why not just mount the code in the container instead of copying it over? Rust deals very cleanly with build artefacts from different architectures so there's no risk of corruption.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rust is actually portable by fnord123 on Thursday July 28, 2022 @06:06AM (#32262453)
This is a good idea but there is tension between this straightforward approach and the fact that, on macos, docker is running in a VM so it's inherently slower.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rust is actually portable by arein3 on Thursday July 28, 2022 @09:30AM (#32264021)
Isn't docker trying to use virtualization from the OS to run linux on "bare metal"? If so it should acheive similar speeds to native linux
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rust is actually portable by tinco on Thursday July 28, 2022 @03:12PM (#32268881)
The virtualized storage layer could actually be a bottleneck here. Though I think they've improved the performance of it to the point where it might no longer be a bottleneck but I'm not sure.
[ Parent | on HN ]