Re:Everyone seems to forget why GNOME and GNOME 3 and Unity ...
by lproven on Thursday July 28, 2022 @06:05AM
(#32262446)
I wrote the article. The legal threats I cited were not and are not a fabrication.
I did not write these other articles covering it:
https://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007...
https://www.mercurynews.com/2007/05/15/microsoft-says-linux-...
https://www.computerworld.com/article/2566211/study--linux-m...
Re:Everyone seems to forget why GNOME and GNOME 3 and Unity ...
by ndhlms on Thursday July 28, 2022 @06:13PM
(#32270695)
The problem is you're still failing to demonstrate a causal link between threats of legal action and GNOME3 or Unity.
I was around during this time and early adopter of GNOME Shell (i.e. 2.31.x); there was and is zero evidence indicating that legal issues were even a consideration.
There is, on the other hand, mountain ranges of evidence indicating this was driven by everything but legal issues[1][2][3].
[1]: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeShell/FAQ#What_problems...
[2]: http://wingolog.org/archives/2008/06/07/gnome-in-the-age-of-...
On the topic of Unity: I, a linux user since the mid 90s, worked an actual linux job through the forced deprecation of GNOME 2.. I don't have much anything constructive to say about it. I even used fvwm2 for a while after gnome2 got yoinked.. it was a nice reminder of my halcyon days writing perl in xemacs, running fvwm on my sparc 2. It wasn't too long after that I landed on xfce. I still wonder what gnome2 could've been.
All I ever wanted was a compositing, focus-follows-mouse, raise/lower window manager with a full-featured keyboard shortcut config. I still feel as though we were sold out. I don't think my mental representation of Canonical will ever recover. It just felt so blatantly anti-user during that period, and that impression has not been tempered with the passage of time.