Re:FCC fines Charter, LTD Broadband more than $3M for RDOF d...
by csb6 on Monday July 25, 2022 @09:31PM
(#32233235)
Exactly. High speed internet is no longer a novelty. It is necessary for most people who use the Internet/stream video. A municipal, “no frills” package that is just a slow DSL connection would be inadequate.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FCC fines Charter, LTD Broadband more than $3M for RDOF d...
by IMSAI8080 on Tuesday July 26, 2022 @12:03PM
(#32240098)
No-one said slow. I was thinking FTTP. However a public sector initiative would come with limits. It has to come with limits because people demand low taxes. Let's say the public sector does the math and says 500Mbit is what they can guarantee for equitable distribution to all addresses. That should be plenty for most people. But there will always be one person who demands their god given right to 10 gigabit. In which case you direct them to the private sector and tell them to pay for it on their own.
Re:FCC fines Charter, LTD Broadband more than $3M for RDOF d...
by Wowfunhappy on Tuesday July 26, 2022 @02:04PM
(#32241651)
Wouldn't the private ISP offering 10 gigabits have to lay their own pipes anyway, to support that speed?
Re:FCC fines Charter, LTD Broadband more than $3M for RDOF d...
by IMSAI8080 on Sunday July 31, 2022 @08:29AM
(#32295059)
Not necessarily. If you lay down FTTP for 500Mbit it'll work at 10 gig no problem. You need to change the equipment at either end. In fact it'll work well beyond that speed if someone wants to pay for the equipment. But if the private sector wants to lay down their own cable in parallel to the public sector then who is stopping them?
Re:FCC fines Charter, LTD Broadband more than $3M for RDOF d...
by troon-lover on Tuesday July 26, 2022 @08:34AM
(#32237419)
Streaming video is not a necessity.