Also one of the largest investors, Accel, totally didn't own Trulia, which was totally not bought by Zillow. And Zillow totally isn't a major advertiser on Vox[0].
[0] https://www.vox.com/ad/16158882/zillow-zestimate-explained
Just off the top of my head, in a town of 100K, I can pretty easily think of 100's of homes that were not built because of NIMBYs.
Also, did you miss the bit where Zillow got their asses handed to them because they screwed up and lost a lot of money?
Where's my check? Should I contact Accel? If I'm owed money pro-rata vs. Vox's readership, I should be able to buy a new car with the money.
Or they all don't believe it's the investors because they're right and that's what the data says.
[1] https://www.vox.com/22789296/housing-crisis-rent-relief-cont...
Correct. This article has the receipts:
https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/22524829/wall-street-housin...
And the conclusion is worth sharing:
> The role of institutional investors is still being studied, but the popularity of the narrative strikes at something dangerous: People want a convenient boogeyman and when they get it, they often ignore the structural problems that are harder to combat. Housing undersupply is the result of decades of locals opposing new home building. It’s not something that can be blamed on Wall Street greed and the nefarious tinkering of a private equity firm. And that’s a much harder truth to stomach.
A huge part of the problem is the NIMBYs.