Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera...
by synu on Monday July 25, 2022 @05:27AM
(#32222230)
The specific statement I was responding to was this:
> I can say I believe 80% of science wrong AND not reproducible, 10% being an outright fraud (10% being legit).
.. which I interpreted to be a statement on "whether science works."
If we instead constrain that to 80% of science that was posted recently in journals, and mainly not in hard sciences, then I could totally get behind that. But I don't think that's what they said, and I think that's why I've been confused by this whole thread.
> I can say I believe 80% of science wrong AND not reproducible, 10% being an outright fraud (10% being legit).
.. which I interpreted to be a statement on "whether science works."
If we instead constrain that to 80% of science that was posted recently in journals, and mainly not in hard sciences, then I could totally get behind that. But I don't think that's what they said, and I think that's why I've been confused by this whole thread.