Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera...
by themitigating on Sunday July 24, 2022 @10:50AM
(#32214027)
Your job doesn't cause you to examine enough papers to create a conclusion for all research being done around the world.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera...
by OrangeMonkey on Sunday July 24, 2022 @10:58AM
(#32214100)
I know you are trying to say something, but I am not quite following what it is you are trying to say. Being more blunt may help.
You may disagree with the experiences I have had as it may not be in alignment with your thoughts and ideals, and it still doesnt make you a bad person. It doesn't make me a bad person either.
Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera...
by origin_path on Sunday July 24, 2022 @01:11PM
(#32215468)
What they're saying is that the level of corruption and false claims varies dramatically by field. Biology/medical/public health/social science seems to be incredibly corrupt but e.g. computer science doesn't have the same issues in the same way. Even then you can drill down to sub-fields, so ML has bigger problems within CS than computer graphics does for example.
Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera...
by themitigating on Monday July 25, 2022 @06:28AM
(#32222601)
I didn't say you were a bad person. Your personal experiences in a field as large as "scientific research" offer you no useful information to judge that entire field.