Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera...
by dahart on Sunday July 24, 2022 @10:19AM
(#32213738)
> how can you argue with “the science”?
Yeah, totally agreed. It doesn’t even make sense to suggest that testing to check whether things work or not is the wrong process. The scientific method is tautologically true, right? This is one of the reasons I cringe at the yard signs in my neighborhood that declare “science is real”, as if it needed an affirmation. Somehow that seems to give more credibility to the idea that science might not be real, whatever that means. Of course science is real. We don’t have modern houses or cars or computers without, sillies.
A lot of things look like science and use the word “science” in them but don’t use the process of science to make their claims to truth. This is useful because how can you argue with “the science”?