Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera...
by legulere on Sunday July 24, 2022 @09:46AM
(#32213461)
The corona vaccine was tested with more scrutiny and larger cohort sizes than other vaccines before. Are you putting doubt on other vaccines as well?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera...
by throwawaymaths on Sunday July 24, 2022 @10:06AM
(#32213634)
But there was one thing they couldn't have more rigor on testing - time.
Re:Two decades of Alzheimer’s research was based on delibera...
by galangalalgol on Sunday July 24, 2022 @11:26AM
(#32214370)
I got the jab and the booster, but I think it is pretty clear the political pressure to call it good was higher than in any of those previous vaccines. The monetary pressure was probably also higher. I would not be even remotely surprised if we find it was more dangerous than most vaccines from an autoimmune standpoint simply because of the nature of the virus. I still think the risk-reward was good for almost all adults, and probably children too (my kid got theirs when it was approved), and I understand the paternalistic reasons for guilding the lily on its safety are well intentioned. But I also think it is naive to assume all that pressure had no effect.