News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by tokamak on Saturday July 23, 2022 @05:21AM (#32201724)
Can QC simulate that?
Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by ki_ on Saturday July 23, 2022 @05:40AM (#32201805)
QC cant do anything, it has no use cases. And that won't change. Except if you want to generate random numbers. that it can do.
Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by ddbb33 on Saturday July 23, 2022 @06:14AM (#32201974)
Care to justify?
Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by ki_ on Saturday July 23, 2022 @06:41AM (#32202111)
because Qbits are just random numbers. They want to make u believe that Qbits represent a range of values, which is true in theory, but in reality it's just a plain old single random number. So all QC calculation are basically random + random * random - random = ... random ofc. I think google it's only QC application was a program that generates some random hash. Other than that, QC hasnt done anything else, nor do i believe it can.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2227490-googles-quantum...

Note, it turned out later that classical computers could still do this faster, so, another QC fail.

Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by gaze on Saturday July 23, 2022 @08:17AM (#32202630)
There’s many criticisms to be made about quantum computing but you don’t understand quantum mechanics at all.
Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by ki_ on Saturday July 23, 2022 @02:37PM (#32206191)
really? How come reality keeps agreeing with me then? Where are these amazing quantum mechanics applications? U really believe in super position?? really? How long have they been working on QC? 50 years now? it never seems to work or be ready.. i wonder why.
Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by gaze on Saturday July 23, 2022 @07:24PM (#32208575)
I have no idea why you think reality agrees with you. I “believe” in superposition, entanglement, and the like because I’ve tested it myself in a lab with a six qubit quantum computer I built.
Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by ki_ on Sunday July 24, 2022 @11:41AM (#32214510)
My point is that your quantum computer isnt able to do anything. It's junk, spewing out random data.
Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by gspr on Saturday July 23, 2022 @07:16AM (#32202289)
I think you should take a class or two on quantum mechanics before making assertions like these.
Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by ThePhysicist on Saturday July 23, 2022 @05:42AM (#32201815)
Re:The need for quantum computers remains small by tokamak on Saturday July 23, 2022 @12:57PM (#32205130)
Nice example!