News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Hertz paid Accenture $32M for a website that never went l... by airstrike on Thursday July 21, 2022 @05:17PM (#32185209)
I often wonder how much it would cost to literally hire the best freelancers in the market today to build their alternative to this monstrosity
Re:Hertz paid Accenture $32M for a website that never went l... by karaterobot on Thursday July 21, 2022 @06:12PM (#32185845)
I'm not one of the best freelancers in the world, but I suspect that if I were, I would say there's no amount of money you could pay me, because I'm already making all the money I want working on projects I am interested in. The fact that, in our reality, Hertz went with Accenture, probably indicates they have other dysfunctions as well, and would be a pain to work with.
Re:Hertz paid Accenture $32M for a website that never went l... by robswc on Thursday July 21, 2022 @09:55PM (#32187559)
I really think the skills and "product" would be better. The managing and structure could be a nightmare though.

Then again, Accenture shows they can be a nightmare too.

Re:Hertz paid Accenture $32M for a website that never went l... by drdaeman on Thursday July 21, 2022 @05:54PM (#32185680)
Probably much less. The issue is finding those folks (or getting hold of their time).
Re:Hertz paid Accenture $32M for a website that never went l... by kingo55 on Thursday July 21, 2022 @05:40PM (#32185507)
100x cheaper.