It just doesn't seem to harm the corporation enough. The requests for subsidies, the limitations of available support that put the public at risk should be negatively impacting leadership of these organizations drastically.

The people who make the cuts see a small immediate gain. The losses of the company as a whole as people leave take at least some months.

In the case of a hospital and emergency room, they will usually have a monopoly in a given arena, so the losses will be felt by taxpayers and insurance premium payers. And the patients who end up getting lower quality are due to turbulence in operations. And the workers who cannot afford to or decide not to quit who have to deal with lower quality of life at work.

This is my frustration.

How is it when I fuck up at work, I get fired but when these definitely reversible decisions are made and allowed to run their course for years we dont see a mass exodus at the SVP level?

Maybe not enough people know what's really happening with those companies.

Nobody is really evaluated all that effectively on an individual level. I can't figure out the difference in my performance reviews between advocating, coming up with new ideas, and taking initiative vs just working on tickets and not saying a word in meetings.