News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bluetooth remains an 'unusually painful' technology after... by consp on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @07:19AM (#32164126)
Any high power 2.4ghz transmitter will destroy Bluetooth communication, this is all in the same 2.45ghz ISM band. I guess they use some devices communicating on that band.
Re:Bluetooth remains an 'unusually painful' technology after... by dcx on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @07:37AM (#32164253)
They certainly do - walkie-talkies!

Edit: Yes, they do exist - you can google this. But on reflection, a commenter below is probably right that it's more likely wireless security cameras, given typical site requirements (range, penetration depth)

Re:Bluetooth remains an 'unusually painful' technology after... by gruez on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @08:29AM (#32164786)
I don't think they use the 2.4 GHz band.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Mobile_Radio_Service

Re:Bluetooth remains an 'unusually painful' technology after... by gorgoiler on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @08:20AM (#32164687)
Handhelds are usually UHF - in the 446MHz range. Do you know of personal radios that operate in the 2.4GHz unlicensed spectrum?
Re:Bluetooth remains an 'unusually painful' technology after... by tekknik on Thursday July 21, 2022 @09:18AM (#32178974)
Drones (FPV), baby monitors to name two. I’m sure there’s more.