Re:SEC issues more than $17M award to a whistleblower
by ahtihn on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @02:25AM
(#32162182)
Why would you link to discussions in subs filled with financially illiterate cultists? Why would that be interesting for anyone sane?
Re:SEC issues more than $17M award to a whistleblower
by thorncorona on Wednesday July 20, 2022 @04:30AM
(#32162974)
As bad as those subreddits are, they did have a point that people were taking positions in undetectable ways, as Bill Huang so helpfully pointed out.
Perhaps some of their other points may bear fruit.
Superstonk subreddit has many posts discussing about SEC whistleblower awards.
For example https://old.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ngbnmt/sec_awar...
"SEC Awards More Than $28 Million to Whistleblower Who Aided SEC and Other Agency Actions"
And over a year ago https://old.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/nf3n64/474_of_t...
"47.4% of the Amount of all SEC Whistleblower Awards Ever Given Have Been Awarded in the Last 12 Months (Out of 105 Months of Program Activity)"
and the last post linked above represents that more persons are realizing and fearlessly speaking up.
In my own post https://old.reddit.com/r/infinitypool/comments/v5tgkj/yalol_... I referenced history things I became aware of since 1999
but also in https://old.reddit.com/r/infinitypool/comments/v5wjy1/yalov_... related concerns since before I was born, back in 1978. Not exactly related to whistleblowing, but practically connectable dots to due diligencely investigative journalistly potentially map out understanding the complexity of things that relate to noticeable increase in SEC whistleblower reportings.