News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel Microcode Decryptor by adrian_b on Tuesday July 19, 2022 @05:14AM (#32149235)
For now, the decryption keys have been obtained only for older Atom CPUs (e.g. Apollo Lake, Denverton, Gemini Lake).

While these are reasonably widespread in the cheapest personal computers and servers, the impact of examining their microcode is much less than if the decryption keys for some of the mainstream Core or Xeon CPUs would have been obtained.

In a more decent world, the manufacturers of CPUs would have been obliged to only sign their microcode updates, without also encrypting them, to enable the owners of the CPUs to audit any microcode update if they desire so, in order to ensure that the update does not introduce hidden vulnerabilities.

Re:Intel Microcode Decryptor by asah on Tuesday July 19, 2022 @01:17PM (#32154919)
Atom and Core/Xeon don't share microcode? e.g. vulnerabilities in one would never work on the other?
Re:Intel Microcode Decryptor by adrian_b on Tuesday July 19, 2022 @02:47PM (#32156175)
No, the microinstruction formats are very different, so also the microprograms must be different.

Even the newer Atom cores, e.g. the Tremont cores from Jasper Lake/Elkhart Lake/Snow Ridge/Parker Ridge/Lakefield have a different microinstruction format than that which has been published now.

For every generation of Intel CPUs, reverse-engineering the microcode requires all the work to be done again, what has been discovered for another generation cannot help much.