News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Glassdoor not so anonymous by kortilla on Tuesday July 19, 2022 @01:02AM (#32147721)
It’s a contractual agreement to not air dirty laundry in exchange for money. If you want to bitch about the company publicly, don’t accept a payment not to.
Re:Glassdoor not so anonymous by gzer0 on Tuesday July 19, 2022 @07:35AM (#32150125)
Unfortunately, this is not true. An NDA is not a free pass to being able to censor whatever you want, even if the person signing the NDA took a fee, or received payment.

"NDAs do not prohibit people from reporting suspected corrupt conduct to an appropriate authority. The Crime and Corruption Act 2001 and the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2010 provide safeguards that allow people who have signed an NDA to report suspected wrongdoing, including corrupt conduct, maladministration and the misuse of public resources.

Under no circumstances do they oblige people who have signed them to maintain secrecy about suspected wrongdoing. You can still report suspected wrongdoing despite signing an NDA."

[1] https://www.ccc.qld.gov.au/sites/default/files/Docs/Publicat...

Re:Glassdoor not so anonymous by Root_Denied on Tuesday July 19, 2022 @12:07PM (#32153745)
I don't know that I'd consider Glassdoor "an appropriate authority" to be reporting corrupt or illegal conduct to.