News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A two-year NoSQL case study: technologies, trade-offs, tips by jhs on Wednesday November 09, 2011 @03:11AM (#3214751)
"NoSQL" is meaningless. Instead, look at programming language terminology: general-purpose languages vs. domain-specific languages.

CouchDB is a domain-specific database.

Re:A two-year NoSQL case study: technologies, trade-offs, tips by jchrisa on Wednesday November 09, 2011 @03:23AM (#3214777)
I prefer to think of it as a kernel, especially in the context of all the systems built in top of it. Not just Couchbase and Cloudant but also various users who have custom wrappers (Meebo, Bing back in the day, new stuff like Refuge and mobile versions...)
Re:A two-year NoSQL case study: technologies, trade-offs, tips by banjiewen on Wednesday November 09, 2011 @10:07AM (#3215687)
This is a good way to look at it, I think. People often ask if I'd use CouchDB again if I was building another similar system - I would, but I'd restrict it to a subset of the problem that was best-suited to CouchDB's strengths/quirks.

(note: I gave the linked talk)

Re:A two-year NoSQL case study: technologies, trade-offs, tips by itaborai83 on Wednesday November 09, 2011 @10:38AM (#3215871)
and what would that subset be in your opinion?