Re:What I learned trying to classify abortion access across ...
by pyuser583 on Monday July 18, 2022 @06:06PM
(#32144608)
I can come up with an argument against this. You have no major premise. All you have are two minors premises and two conclusions:
* X actions ought not to be done, forced organ donation is a type of X action, therefore forced organ donations ought not to be done.
* X actions ought not to be done, forbidding abortion (like forced organ donation is an X action) is a type of X action, therefore forbidding abortion ought not to be done.
But what is X category of actions!?!
Is it:
* Violations of autonomy?
* Deprivations of moral agency?
* Distracting the proletariat from organizing against the capitalist class (why abortion was first legalized!)?
* Causing greater pain and suffering than it relieves?
You never actually take a position on why forcing organ donation is bad. It simply sounds bad, and scares people, so it must be bad.
* X actions ought not to be done, forced organ donation is a type of X action, therefore forced organ donations ought not to be done.
* X actions ought not to be done, forbidding abortion (like forced organ donation is an X action) is a type of X action, therefore forbidding abortion ought not to be done.
But what is X category of actions!?!
Is it:
* Violations of autonomy?
* Deprivations of moral agency?
* Distracting the proletariat from organizing against the capitalist class (why abortion was first legalized!)?
* Causing greater pain and suffering than it relieves?
You never actually take a position on why forcing organ donation is bad. It simply sounds bad, and scares people, so it must be bad.
Why is forced organ donation wrong?