News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Snapchat for Web by solarkraft on Monday July 18, 2022 @05:17PM (#32143881)
Well that's cool for users with rooted Android devices, which are currently blocked from logging in with an obscure error message.
Re:Snapchat for Web by noname120 on Monday July 18, 2022 @06:32PM (#32144922)
Just root with Magisk and add the app to the DenyList. Poof.
Re:Snapchat for Web by lordofgibbons on Monday July 18, 2022 @09:37PM (#32146461)
Can you please explain what this means? Is this a way to bypass rooted device detection aka attestation?
Re:Snapchat for Web by josephcsible on Monday July 18, 2022 @10:48PM (#32146971)
This will only work until Google starts mandating TEE attestation of bootloader status for SafetyNet.
Re:Snapchat for Web by Nextgrid on Tuesday July 19, 2022 @05:55AM (#32149465)
Which will then be bypassed using some other way, just like every DRM so far ended up being cracked.
Re:Snapchat for Web by RobbieGM on Tuesday July 19, 2022 @10:07AM (#32151661)
Sure, but can it be done in software, or will it require a scanning tunneling microscope?
Re:Snapchat for Web by thtpol on Monday July 18, 2022 @06:01PM (#32144536)
It's not meant for mobile phones (who can install the Snapchat app already), clearly targeted for desktop users as a companion app
Re:Snapchat for Web by metadat on Monday July 18, 2022 @06:04PM (#32144581)
I wouldn't normally bring this up but in this case it's a significant oversight: Did you read the comment you've replied to?

Grandparent comment explicitly states a rooted android phone cannot install the Snapchat app.

Snap has ensured it cannot work on a rooted device (as bank apps also do) to make it difficult to mess with the binary and end up saving or harvesting temporarily viewable content like snaps of genitalia or whatever people use snap for.

Re:Snapchat for Web by solarkraft on Monday July 18, 2022 @07:03PM (#32145243)
> to make it difficult to mess with the binary and end up saving or harvesting temporarily viewable content

Which is funny because it's trivial without any modifications to the device (at least when I last used it). Just record the screen.

Re:Snapchat for Web by jondwillis on Monday July 18, 2022 @07:10PM (#32145298)
For extra points, record it while in airplane mode, then delete the app. Snap now has no idea and cannot tattle.
Re:Snapchat for Web by metadat on Monday July 18, 2022 @07:12PM (#32145326)
IIRC, screen recording or screenshotting will bubble an alert to the other party about what you've done, unless you disconnect from the network or some other shenanigans.
Re:Snapchat for Web by lucb1e on Monday July 18, 2022 @07:42PM (#32145601)
Of course, taking a regular old picture of the screen of a DRM'd device is still a thing in your own private home. DRM goes only so far, though deterrence does help to some extent I'll admit. Question is if we're willing to accept DRM'd devices following us around all day long so that we can have nudes via a not-e2ee messenger with slightly less risk of the other person sharing it.
Re:Snapchat for Web by pmontra on Tuesday July 19, 2022 @12:41AM (#32147617)
About some other shenanigans if you really care about recording the screen you can use another phone or a camera, possibly on a tripod to keep it steady and the distance constant. That's lower quality than a screenshot but it's basically undetectable.

And how about running in a VM on a desktop? Does Snapchat allow that?

Re:Snapchat for Web by jonathantf2 on Tuesday July 19, 2022 @05:45AM (#32149414)
on my Pixel screen recording doesn't notify the other user.
Re:Snapchat for Web by entropie on Monday July 18, 2022 @07:20PM (#32145408)
Interestingly, my GF asked me a few hours before if I knew (I did in fact not) that users get a notification when you screenshot their stories from Instagram.