News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Okay, Google: To protect women, collect less data about e... by Akronymus on Monday July 18, 2022 @05:17AM (#32136164)
Which is definitely something that needs fixing. Yet, I also see plenty of advocates for REALLY late abortions and such, along with people being proud of getting abortions.

remember "Safe, Legal and rare?"

Re:Okay, Google: To protect women, collect less data about e... by pjc50 on Monday July 18, 2022 @07:11AM (#32136831)
"Legal" is a pre-requisite for "safe", and comprehensive sex education is a pre-requisite for "rare". Nobody's getting abortions just for the sake of it, I assure you. Since there's no appetite for compromise or even fact-based discussion from the anti-side, here you are.
Re:Okay, Google: To protect women, collect less data about e... by Akronymus on Monday July 18, 2022 @07:16AM (#32136873)
> "Legal" is a pre-requisite for "safe", and comprehensive sex education is a pre-requisite for "rare".

Legal can have different extents. For example, no questions asked for the first 12 weeks, questions asked next 12, under VERY specific conditions on the last 12 weeks. Another extent could be no questions asked, period. And yeah, proper sex-ed is pretty important.

> Nobody's getting abortions just for the sake of it, I assure you.

Sure, nobody is getting pregnant just to have an abortion. A, IMO, worrying amount of cases use abortions as a replacement for contraception.

> Since there's no appetite for compromise or even fact-based discussion from the anti-side, here you are.

Same could be said for the pro side.

Re:Okay, Google: To protect women, collect less data about e... by mlang79 on Monday July 18, 2022 @06:10AM (#32136458)
The new wave of feminism apparently doesn't want to remember this phrase anymore: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/12/the-brilli...