News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mass and angular momentum, left ambiguous by Einstein, ge... by leephillips on Friday July 15, 2022 @05:59PM (#32113238)
The misleading and faulty explanation in this link talks about the “desire” of a point on the wheel to move in a certain direction. Now that’s some magical thinking.
Re:Mass and angular momentum, left ambiguous by Einstein, ge... by gumby on Friday July 15, 2022 @08:16PM (#32114116)
You might want to read “The Intentional Stance” by Daniel Dennett, a philosophical treatise basically on how we usefully ascribe desire or intention to inanimate objects and phenomena as a mental model (for example, saying that “The thermostat tries to keep the temperature between 20 and 30”).

(This is not a comment on the precession video itself, which haven’t clicked on)

Re:Mass and angular momentum, left ambiguous by Einstein, ge... by leephillips on Friday July 15, 2022 @08:20PM (#32114135)
I’m well aware of this manner of speaking. Everyone is. If you did look at what I was commenting on (not a video) you might agree that its use in that case doesn’t help, at all. Or not.

I’ll look up the Dennett article, thanks.

Re:Mass and angular momentum, left ambiguous by Einstein, ge... by lucideer on Friday July 15, 2022 @09:15PM (#32114449)
I haven't read the Dennett article but in this specific context, "desire" just seems like a simple proxy for momentum. What am I missing?
Re:Mass and angular momentum, left ambiguous by Einstein, ge... by aliraheem on Saturday July 16, 2022 @02:37PM (#32120671)
I agree.

I don't see how this is not magical thinking but the rules of arithmetic are.