Re:Why wasn't the steam engine invented earlier? Part II
by jaclaz on Friday July 15, 2022 @12:59PM
(#32110244)
>which is attributed to Alexander Graham Bell in most of the world and to Antonio Meucci in my native Italy.
The US congress did vote a resolution that cleared the matter (in 2002, a bit late I would say):
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-148/iss...
But in this case Bell and Meucci weren't much disparate sources.
Re:Why wasn't the steam engine invented earlier? Part II
by qubex on Friday July 15, 2022 @02:50PM
(#32111530)
I’m honestly stunned because I had no idea this issue had been raised, much less addressed.
Re:Why wasn't the steam engine invented earlier? Part II
by jaclaz on Saturday July 16, 2022 @03:59AM
(#32116080)
Yep, the US somehow cleared the matter, but Canada swiftly affirmed the opposite in a one liner:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invention_of_the_telephone
https://web.archive.org/web/20141222093046/http://www2.parl....
Re:Why wasn't the steam engine invented earlier? Part II
by stevenjgarner on Friday July 15, 2022 @09:23AM
(#32107900)
Agreed. Definitely makes you wonder about the fairness of intellectual property.
Consider the telephone, which is attributed to Alexander Graham Bell in most of the world and to Antonio Meucci in my native Italy. Or radio, which is broadly attributed to Marconi or Tesla. In hindsight it seems like one person triumphed upon others, but really if you look at it from their point of view they work with urgency and secrecy because they perceive themselves to be in neck-to-neck competition with their cohorts. They perceive their technological environ very differently from how we do ex post facto.