YouTube has decided our Arc A380 review is “18 only” and “not suitable for ads”

Re:YouTube has decided our Arc A380 review is “18 only” and ... by rasz on Thursday July 14, 2022 @07:46PM (#32102741)

Automation!

>Despite having 1.6M+ subs, we no longer have a creator contact at YouTube

This single account generates >20K of pure profit to Google every single month, still too small to provide someone with a pulse.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube has decided our Arc A380 review is “18 only” and ... by LewisVerstappen on Thursday July 14, 2022 @08:17PM (#32102984)

Completely absurd. Same for Facebook too. You can spend thousands of dollars on the Facebook/Instagram Ad platform but apparently that's not good enough to get you a dedicated rep who you can call.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube has decided our Arc A380 review is “18 only” and ... by NonNefarious on Thursday July 14, 2022 @10:09PM (#32103839)

Google and Facebook are customer-mocking and -abusing trash.

This is the problem with building your business on someone else's property. They can screw you at any time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:YouTube has decided our Arc A380 review is “18 only” and ... by m-p-3 on Thursday July 14, 2022 @11:08PM (#32104196)

And even worse is that there is no appeal process available.

Absolutely disrespectful.

[ Parent | on HN ]