Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent

Re:Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her co... by anotherman554 on Thursday July 14, 2022 @04:07PM (#32100865)

I think the issue with getting a release is it shields you from litigation. It doesn't necessarily mean you'd lose the litigation if you didn't get the release, but a business is not going to want to take the risk they'd have litigation hanging over their head preventing the exploitation of the intellectual property asset.

A journalist presumably isn't going to be getting permission to film, they are going to show up to where the news is and film.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her co... by strogonoff on Friday July 15, 2022 @01:52AM (#32105013)

I think the intent should matter, but how to capture this in the letter of the law is the question.

The intent is wildly different between actual journalism, and indie film or art project shoot, and behaving obnoxiously towards bystanders in order to directly convert attention into money.

Does TikTok require a business account or something like that in order to be paid? That could be a useful indicator.

[ Parent | on HN ]