Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by spaniard89277 on Thursday July 14, 2022 @01:11PM
(#32098785)
Hmm, im on mobile now but I believe it's called non-tradeable goods in english.
Basically you cant move supply around.
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by feet on Thursday July 14, 2022 @11:15AM
(#32097067)
I think it might help to find out the definitions of terms before assuming the statement is wrong
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by macksd on Thursday July 14, 2022 @11:47AM
(#32097593)
Can you help me with the definition, then? I can't find that word in any of my dictionaries and search engines are suggesting I mean "non-transferable" which is not a property of land in NYC.
Unless there's a definition, saying that this property calls for heavy state intervention is indeed a bold claim.
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by feet on Thursday July 14, 2022 @02:19PM
(#32099639)
I never stated that they were correct or made any comment on the substance of the original post. I criticized the criticism as being poorly formed
Asking the original poster for clarification of terms would be the move before assuming something
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by abduhl on Thursday July 14, 2022 @11:18AM
(#32097108)
Non transable is not a term that anyone uses and therefore is not one that has a definition outside of this thread. Which is why GP asked what it is, smart ass.
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by feet on Thursday July 14, 2022 @11:21AM
(#32097160)
And the person I'm replying to, in the order of their statements and questions, first assumes that it is a bold claim and after that decides they don't understand the statement they're replying to. It's backwards
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by mym1990 on Thursday July 14, 2022 @11:23AM
(#32097194)
Must be fun spending the whole day looking for technicalities to address.
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by feet on Thursday July 14, 2022 @11:46AM
(#32097563)
No, I just understand how to make valid criticisms. First step before you can criticize is to understand what you're criticizing
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by abduhl on Thursday July 14, 2022 @12:00PM
(#32097764)
Apparently not because you didn't even understand what the GP was calling a bold claim (it wasn’t land being nontransable).
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by feet on Thursday July 14, 2022 @02:22PM
(#32099679)
Really? You must have missed that the exact sentence that they quoted was based around the term that they didn't understand
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by abduhl on Thursday July 14, 2022 @11:46AM
(#32097575)
It's not backwards. Calling housing and land an X and saying that this means it should have heavy state intervention IS a bold claim regardless of what X is because it's calling for heavy state intervention.
Compare: "Abortion is a non-transable good and therefore there should be heavy state intervention in it." "Video games are non-transable goods and so there should be heavy state intervention in it." "Cryptography is a non-transable good and therefore should heavily be regulated by the government."
All of these are BOLD claims regardless of what non-transable means, and it's appropriate to ask what non-transable means in order to understand why the bold claim stands.
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by aaaaaaaaaaab on Thursday July 14, 2022 @11:56AM
(#32097709)
Sorry, but this is a non-transable comment, and I only reply to transable comments.
Re:Manhattan rents cross $5k threshold for first time
by spaniard89277 on Thursday July 14, 2022 @02:27PM
(#32099737)
I like your style, you made me laugh.
That's a bold claim. What led you to believe that's the case? And what is a "non-transable good"?