… according to him (and you can’t ignore those examples are hand picked to support his agenda). Personally I’m tired of social vigilantism. Let the law punish these people if they’re really what he calls them. If they’re not harming you don’t go looking for trouble.

> Let the law punish these people One of the people he picked as an example is the law. He's a white supremacist cop from Illinois: https://accollective.noblogs.org/post/2022/04/01/magic-dirt-.... So what you're asking for can't and won't happen. "Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses."

Undoubtably, at high volume, he’s bound to get a few right. Still, I don't agree with the extrajudicial process, full stop. I’d rather have a few shit-stain racist internet trolls um trolling than decent people constantly under fire for dissenting viewpoints.

I'm betting the kind of genocide he likes escapes condemnation though.

Or is he also naming and shaming people who call for mass immigration to Europe, those demanding citizenship for illegal aliens in the US, advocates for 'asylum seekers' in Australian detention, etc?

Do you know what genocide means?

Yes. Do you know that indigenous Europeans are a tiny global minority (approx 8%) and that their ancestral homeland is the target of a massive, concentrated effort to flood with foreigners via mass immigration, laws prohibiting the defence or even criticism of this replacement, media efforts to normalise interraciality and minimise visibility of indigenous Europeans, etc? Do you know that this is also occurring in North America and Oceania? Do you know that indigenous Europeans will be minorities in many of their own countries by the end of the century?

It's not okay just because they're White.