News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Andrej Karpathy leaves Tesla by zmmmmm on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @07:13PM (#32089902)
> any of those could be forged / faked without some kind of way of securely validating the message

Any reason routine crypto methods would not solve this? Seems like one of the easier parts to me.

Re:Andrej Karpathy leaves Tesla by alasdair_ on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @08:26PM (#32090448)
Who controls the signing keys and the whole signing process? What about key revocation if someone steals the key? Will a municipality in Texas really be willing to not be allowed to create a new stoplight without approval from the federal agency in charge of the keys? What’s to stop someone stealing a “real” stoplight from bumfuck nowhere and putting it in the middle of the 101 at rush hour? What about replay attacks? What about signal jamming? Etc. etc.
Re:Andrej Karpathy leaves Tesla by zmmmmm on Thursday July 14, 2022 @01:48AM (#32092473)
You raise some genuine possible concerns but generically I'd probably tend to just say, "laws will stop them" just like they already stop someone deliberately endangering lives by placing a real fake stop light in the middle of the 101 at rush hour.

The real concern would be whether someone can engineer a terrorist level mass scale attack but as long as it requires physical tampering that adds up to a tremendous amount of work. So if the signalling is largely burned into fixed infastructure it eliminates a lot of that or at least sets the bar high enough that its probably more work than various other types of attack that are likely to be just as impactful.