I find that commenting on health policy while hiding your identity definitely compromises your credibility. If you further compound that by self-publishing your material and writing like a literal child, I don't think it's unwarranted to include that as criticism.

Do you like the content itself? Some random drawing of arrows in cherry-picked graphs?

Are you aware of the censorship going on around anyone who deviates from the official narrative?

As the other poster said, you are aren't attacking the argument, just the fact that it is anonymous.

What's your username on here? epups. The irony.