Re:The Uber leak exposes the global war on workers
by mike00632 on Tuesday July 12, 2022 @06:05PM
(#32076286)
We need "Uber for housing".
Re:The Uber leak exposes the global war on workers
by krysp on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @01:26AM
(#32079288)
That would be Airbnb, and it seems to be turning out about as well for the market
Re:The Uber leak exposes the global war on workers
by pj_mukh on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @01:40AM
(#32079335)
I think they mean Uber for “building” housing. Not just using it.
Re:The Uber leak exposes the global war on workers
by hunter2_ on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @09:41AM
(#32082591)
So instead of workers hanging out at the big box home improvement store wondering if a contractor will scoop them up that day for a few bucks and a sandwich (and said contractor wondering if the work will be any good), these matches will be made by an "Uber for x" app? On the one hand, why not.
Re:The Uber leak exposes the global war on workers
by pj_mukh on Wednesday July 13, 2022 @01:14PM
(#32085677)
Yes labor shortages are a problem.
But in this context, the Uber methodology would be useful for busting through the archaic city approval processes + frivolous environment lawsuits aka the prime driver of the housing shortage [1]
[1]: https://www.npr.org/2022/03/29/1089174630/housing-shortage-n...
a) Uber was a crappy business model that required the exploitation of the labor force to raise money. If this fact can't be fixed for the company to be profitable, the company can shutdown or become a co-op for all I care.
b) Toronto and SF have banned sidewalk robots (until they "study" the situation i.e. until only monopoly transport companies can afford to wait around). NYC had banned scooters and e-bikes till last year, and in fact spent precious police time chasing down delivery workers who motorized their bikes to reduce the physical drudgery of their work. So when the Guardian says "Uber broke municipal law", my question is always "How stupid were these laws?". Most of these city laws consistently over-index for the opinions of the wealthy retirees who can show up at 10am on a Tuesday to yell at their council meetings. So, if VC's want to fund lobby arms to move the needle in breaking through to these councillors, I'm here for it.