US forces nearly all countries to buy USD that eventually get returned as SA-owned debt (huge monetary policy benefits). SA gets more or less bribed by the worlds largest military.
Awkwardness is when SA wants to do stuff that’s is against US morals (like murdering journalists) or when China firmly but politely asks to buy in RMB (like it has recently).
US generally sees petrodollar regime as second only to the military (as evidenced by their eagerness to invade Iraq and gain leverage over SA).
I think there also was the (possibly implied) promise of military protection by the USA
The country which was in midst of protests which their government, dictatorial btw, decided to violently suppress?[7]
Yeah, nice guy all around that Gaddaffi. Oils the only reason anybody would want him gone.
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Flight_103
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTA_Flight_772
[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Yvonne_Fletcher
[3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uganda%E2%80%93Tanzania_War
[4]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chadian%E2%80%93Libyan_conflic...
[5]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian%E2%80%93Libyan_War
[6]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libya%E2%80%93Switzerland_rela...
[7]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Libyan_Civil_War
[8]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Berlin_discotheque_bombin...
Defensive military alliance - NATO - go!
Gee, I wonder how many similar incidents we can count among NATO states going back from 1988
> So in exchange to gaining access to US treasuries (debt) before action, they had to buy US treasuries?
I have no knowledge about this besides what's been written in this thread, but I assume that having the ability to buy before the auction means they get a good deal.