Re:Salt Lake City Confronts a Future Without a Lake
by m0llusk on Monday July 11, 2022 @11:25AM
(#32057372)
The one official says confidently that the drought won't last forever, but there is scientific evidence that current conditions are much closer to long term historical norms than what we have been living with.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Salt Lake City Confronts a Future Without a Lake
by bowtie109 on Monday July 11, 2022 @11:46AM
(#32057676)
Do you mean that drought is more common than what we have been experiencing?
Re:Salt Lake City Confronts a Future Without a Lake
by akhmatova on Monday July 11, 2022 @12:03PM
(#32057940)
No - they're saying that what we call "drought" isn't actually drought, in historical context. It just seems that way if we're looking at too short of a timescale.
Re:Salt Lake City Confronts a Future Without a Lake
by cardiffspaceman on Monday July 11, 2022 @01:42PM
(#32059218)
Another interpretation is, that the drought is part of reverting to a trend line that is not as convenient to what we've been trying to do in the SLC area, as the past couple of centuries were.
Re:Salt Lake City Confronts a Future Without a Lake
by mywittyname on Monday July 11, 2022 @12:25PM
(#32058253)
A human lifetime is a very short timescale. It is possible for something to be "short lived" in a geological sense, but still be devastating to multiple generations of humans.