News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elon’s Out by bmitc on Saturday July 09, 2022 @02:58PM (#32038202)
> Your inability to conceive of a useful purpose for such a quantity of money does not justify prohibiting its existence.

What inability and where was it demonstrated? Are you referring to a useful purpose if it was taxed or a useful purpose for individuals to have such wealth? If the latter, then I propose that an individual containing such wealth is less useful than it being returned.

Those things and countries you mentioned have nothing to do with this discussion.

Re:Elon’s Out by towaway15463 on Saturday July 09, 2022 @05:46PM (#32039588)
It’s rather ironic that a discussion of Elon Musk prompted you to make that assertion.
Re:Elon’s Out by tbihl on Saturday July 09, 2022 @06:38PM (#32039992)
It's so many layers of delightfully nested irony. Give more money to the federal government so they give more big tax credits for Tesla purchases, but Tesla can't exist any more in this fantasy world where nothing outside of the federal government can grow beyond $500 million in scope.
Re:Elon’s Out by bmitc on Saturday July 09, 2022 @08:26PM (#32040670)
I clearly referred to personal wealth.
Re:Elon’s Out by bmitc on Saturday July 09, 2022 @08:26PM (#32040671)
What is ironic?
Re:Elon’s Out by towaway15463 on Saturday July 09, 2022 @10:25PM (#32041292)
You could examine your comment that I replied to for clues.