Re:U.S. Produces More Power from Wind and Solar Than Nuclear...
by mikewarot on Saturday July 09, 2022 @11:11AM
(#32035767)
I'm glad we're starting to take these energy sources seriously. I just hope we don't abandon Nuclear as the base-line relatively clean fuel to power us until we're done with oil.
Re:U.S. Produces More Power from Wind and Solar Than Nuclear...
by einpoklum on Tuesday July 12, 2022 @04:43PM
(#32075410)
Because it's 3x more expensive.
I would _like_ to say because it's still dangerous, and you also have to commit to managing the waste for thousands of years, which is costly and dangerous, but that consideration is probably not paramount in US politicians' minds.
Re:U.S. Produces More Power from Wind and Solar Than Nuclear...
by Manuel_D on Saturday July 09, 2022 @12:54PM
(#32036977)
Serial production stopped in the 1980s. The US lost the economies of scale of it's nuclear industry, so plants built after that experienced higher costs. That, plus misinformation about the safety and environmental impact of nuclear power.
Re:U.S. Produces More Power from Wind and Solar Than Nuclear...
by hunglee2 on Saturday July 09, 2022 @11:13AM
(#32035784)
US could be a powerhouse in renewables. Tap into the geothermal from Yellowstone also and we might be seeing the solidification of permanent US hegemony
I would _like_ to say because it's still dangerous, and you also have to commit to managing the waste for thousands of years, which is costly and dangerous, but that consideration is probably not paramount in US politicians' minds.
It’s politically unpopular to propose a 10-year public works project with very unpredictable budget unless it’s a highway.
If it doesn’t get cancelled, ratepayers pay for the power and a surcharge to fund retiring the plant.
Coal, oil and gas. What other fossil fuels are out there?
peat